We love our customers, in the meantime we spend Sundays with our families.
OUR MISSION IS TO TAILOR FOR EACH CLIENT A BEAUTIFUL, FUNCTIONAL AND ENDURING OUTDOOR ENVIRONMENT THAT WILL PROVIDE A PLACE OF SERENITY FOR FRIENDS AND FAMILY TO APPRECIATE FOR YEARS TO COME.
An underused pool can take over a backyard long after it stops fitting your life. It sets the fencing, the furniture, the circulation, and the maintenance calendar, even in years when nobody swims. But demolition is expensive and irreversible, so the answer is rarely as simple as "just get rid of it." If you are asking whether a pool is worth keeping or removing, the key is to separate four things homeowners tend to blend together: how much you use it, what condition it is actually in, how much yard it controls, and what you would genuinely build in its place. You may keep and refresh the pool, convert its role to a smaller water or patio concept, or remove it and reclaim the footprint. This guide compares those three paths, including drainage, permits, replacement uses, and project scope, so you can make an informed decision before demolition begins.
A tired pool can create a strange kind of decision fatigue. You may dislike maintaining it but still hesitate to remove something that feels permanent. You may imagine a patio in its place, then worry you will miss the water the first hot weekend after construction is finished. That hesitation is useful. Pool decisions are hard to reverse, so the goal is not to force a quick answer. The goal is to separate four things that homeowners often blend together: how much you use the pool, what condition it is in, how much backyard space it controls, and what you would genuinely build if that space became available. Do that first. Then the keep-versus-convert-versus-remove decision becomes much clearer.
Before looking at unused pool options, finish this sentence: "I would enjoy this yard more if…"
Those are different problems, and they lead to different projects. If the pool is still structurally and mechanically serviceable but the surrounding yard is the real disappointment, removal may be solving the wrong problem. If the water itself is what you no longer want, a beautiful new deck around the same full-size pool will not change the core issue. A good decision starts with the complaint, not the construction method.
Pools do more than occupy their own footprint. They also control circulation, fencing, furniture placement, planting, shade, drainage, and where people can safely move through the backyard. Walk the yard as if the pool were not there and note what changes.
This exercise is the same thinking used in good outdoor living space planning: zones should follow how people actually move, sit, cook, gather, and relax, not simply whatever layout already exists.
There are three broad scope tiers, and it helps to name them before comparing construction options. A focused refresh keeps the pool and improves the surrounding deck, planting, drainage, or equipment access. A conversion changes the role of the pool area, such as creating a smaller water concept or a pool-to-patio solution. Full removal or rebuild is the largest scope and must account for backfill, drainage, access, and what replaces the footprint.
Ask one question before comparing those options: if the pool disappeared tomorrow, what would you build in that exact space? If the answer is vague — "maybe more yard" or "probably a patio" — you may not have a strong enough reason to remove it yet. If the answer is specific — "a dining patio connected to the kitchen, a shaded lounge, two planting beds, and open space for the dog" — then you are comparing two real lifestyles rather than reacting to maintenance frustration. That specificity is especially important for a pool-to-patio decision. Removing water only creates an opportunity; the design of the replacement space determines whether the yard actually gets better.
Keeping the pool does not mean accepting the backyard exactly as it is. For many tired pool yards, the water is not the real problem. The problem is the cracked-looking or dated surround, weak shade, awkward furniture zones, exposed equipment, poor planting, or a layout that makes the pool feel like an obstacle instead of an amenity.
Condition should be evaluated by the appropriate pool professional before you build a design around keeping it. Landscape and hardscaping decisions should follow that assessment, not substitute for it.
A pool can feel dramatically different when the surrounding space is redesigned as an outdoor room rather than a strip of paving around water.
If the goal is to make the pool yard useful for dinners and gatherings rather than just swimming, seating, circulation, cooking, shade, and planting all need to work as one plan.
Pool conversion is the middle path, but the phrase covers several very different ideas. Some homeowners mean keeping water but reducing how dominant the pool feels. Others mean a smaller plunge-style concept. Others are imagining a sunken lounge, deck, or patio where the pool used to be. Those should not be grouped together as one easy "conversion." They involve different structural, plumbing, drainage, permitting, and construction questions.
If you like having water but no longer want the entire backyard organized around a full-size pool, a smaller-water concept may be worth exploring. The design question is whether the existing pool can realistically contribute to that concept or whether the work becomes substantial reconstruction. Existing shell geometry, depth, reinforcing, plumbing routes, equipment, access, and local requirements all affect feasibility. Do not assume "make the pool smaller" is automatically simpler than either renovating it or removing it. Sometimes the design makes sense; sometimes it creates a complicated hybrid project. That is why this option should be evaluated as a construction concept, not chosen from an inspiration photo.
The phrase pool to patio sounds simple: remove the water, create a flat surface, put furniture on it. The real project is what happens below that finished surface. A durable patio needs a properly planned base, drainage strategy, finished elevations, and a legal path for what happens to the existing pool shell. Depending on the jurisdiction and the chosen removal or backfill method, the old pool may be removed, partially removed, or handled through a specific approved backfill approach before the new outdoor surface is built. Do not treat an empty pool shell as a ready-made foundation and simply improvise a cover over it. If a retained-shell structural concept is being considered, it needs professional design and approval for the intended use. Once the below-grade strategy is resolved, the visible part becomes a normal patio design problem: size, circulation, shade, furniture, planting edges, and material choice. See our patio design ideas for ways to make the reclaimed footprint feel like part of the yard rather than a rectangle that obviously used to be a pool.
Online inspiration makes old pool shells look endlessly reusable: sunken lounges, gardens, decks, play areas, and other creative conversions. The useful part of those ideas is the question they raise — what new function do you want? The risky part is assuming the existing shell is automatically suitable for that function.
Treat empty pool ideas as design prompts, not construction details. First choose the function; then determine the legal and technically sound way to create it.
Pool removal makes the most sense when the water feature is no longer part of the life you want in the yard and the reclaimed space has a specific job waiting for it.
Removal should be thought of as the first phase of a new yard, not the last phase of an old pool.
Southern California does not have one universal pool-removal detail that applies identically in every city. Permit, demolition, backfill, compaction, drainage, landscape, and future-development requirements can vary by jurisdiction and site conditions. In Glendale, the city's current permit guidance specifically states that pool backfill projects require Design Review, and it notes that backfilled areas are expected to be maintained as landscaping unless the project demonstrates compliance with the applicable development standards for another use. The City of Los Angeles separately maintains a formal "Backfill of Swimming Pools" information bulletin and a process for requests involving filling an existing pool in lieu of removing the shell. The practical takeaway is simple: confirm the local pathway before designing the finished yard over the former pool area. If the project also adds new walls, structures, grading, or substantial hardscaping, review how local wall and hardscape permits work early rather than treating permits as something to solve after the layout is complete.
Homeowners often hear different pool-removal terms and assume they describe the same end result. They do not. The amount of shell removed, how the remaining structure is treated, what fill is used, how it is placed and compacted, how drainage is handled, and what documentation or inspection is required can affect what the area is suitable for afterward. That matters because your future plan may be landscaping, a patio, or some later project you have not imagined yet. Do not choose the below-grade method only by asking which one is fastest. Start with the intended future use of the footprint, then ask what removal or backfill approach your jurisdiction will approve for that use.
A swimming pool is a low point by design. A finished yard usually should not behave like one. When the pool disappears, the new grade has to reconnect to the rest of the property. That means thinking about where surface water goes, how the replacement patio or planting area meets existing elevations, and whether the new layout accidentally creates a basin against the house, wall, or neighboring property. Drainage should be resolved before pavers, concrete, planting, or furniture zones are finalized. The same principle in why grading and runoff cause standing water applies here: the invisible slope and drainage plan needs to work before the finished surface looks good.
Removing a pool only improves the yard if the replacement space earns its footprint. If the reclaimed area is meant for gatherings, our guide to turning a backyard into an entertainment space shows how the layout can support dining, lounging, and cooking as one plan.
This works when the old pool occupies the best flat area in the yard and you routinely need room for dining, lounging, cooking, or gatherings. The design should avoid creating one giant empty slab. Break the space into usable zones, add shade, soften edges with planting, and keep circulation clear.
If what you really want is greenery, trees, a kitchen garden, or a lower-intensity outdoor space, the former pool footprint can become part of a broader landscape design rather than a single hard surface. Explore our landscape design services if the goal is to turn the reclaimed footprint into planting, lawn, pathways, shade, and outdoor-use zones instead of simply paving the entire area.
For many yards, this is the strongest answer: enough hardscaping for furniture and everyday use, enough planting to keep the space cool and visually soft, and enough open area that the backyard does not feel overbuilt. The old pool footprint does not have to remain one single material or one single zone. It can become several smaller outdoor rooms tied together by grade, circulation, and planting.
Families change. A flexible area can serve play, pets, temporary seating, exercise, or future features without locking the yard into one permanent program immediately. This is often more useful than replacing one single-purpose feature with another single-purpose feature simply because you feel pressure to fill the space.
If you are still stuck, score the pool against these six questions.
How often did your household actually use the pool over the last full year? Use real behavior, not the version of summer you hoped you would have.
What does a qualified pool professional say about the shell, plumbing, equipment, and required repairs? Do not make a keep-or-remove decision from appearance alone.
Is the yard missing a function you would use weekly because the pool occupies the only logical place for it?
Does water still belong in the way your household relaxes, entertains, exercises, or spends weekends?
Can you draw or describe exactly what replaces the pool? The more specific the answer, the easier it is to judge whether removal creates real value for your daily life.
Will the chosen removal or conversion method support the way you may want to use the area later? This is where local permit requirements and below-grade construction details matter.
If the pool scores well on use and lifestyle fit, refresh may be the right answer. If you still want water but not a full-size pool-dominated yard, investigate conversion. If use is low, space pressure is high, and the replacement plan is specific, removal becomes much easier to justify.
Homeowners often ask whether removing a pool will help or hurt resale value. There is no responsible universal answer. Buyer preferences differ, neighborhood expectations differ, lot sizes differ, and the quality of both the existing pool and the replacement yard matters. A neglected pool and a beautifully planned pool yard are not the same product. A poorly executed fill-in and a cohesive new outdoor living space are not the same product either. If resale is a major factor, ask a local real-estate professional for property-specific market context. Do not let a generic online claim about "pools always add value" or "buyers hate pools" decide a permanent construction choice.
For an old or underused pool, the most reliable decision process usually looks like this:
Gathering measurements, photos, priorities, and examples before you compare layouts makes the first design meeting far more productive.
An old pool you barely use is not automatically a demolition project. Sometimes the right answer is a better deck, shade, planting, and furniture layout. Sometimes it is a smaller water concept. Sometimes the pool is occupying the exact piece of yard you need for the way you live now. Deciding whether a pool is worth keeping or removing works best from the future yard backward: picture the version you would keep, the version you would convert, and the version with no pool at all, then compare which one creates the outdoor space your household is most likely to use — and confirm the technical and permit path before construction begins. For construction scope and site coordination, review our hardscaping services before demolition.
Compare a focused pool-area refresh, a conversion concept, and a full removal or rebuild path, organized by project intensity rather than published prices, before your design consultation. For a property-specific plan, visit our hardscaping services or book a consultation and call +1 (818) 303-1570.
Start with use, condition, space pressure, and the replacement plan. If you still use the pool and the main frustration is the surrounding yard, keeping and refreshing it may make more sense than removal. If the pool is rarely used, blocks a higher-priority backyard function, and you can clearly describe what will replace it, removal becomes a stronger option. Have the pool's condition evaluated separately so the decision is not based on appearance alone.
The main options are to keep and refresh the pool area, convert the pool's role through a smaller-water or professionally designed reuse concept, or remove and backfill it and redesign the footprint as patio, planting, lawn, or mixed outdoor living space. The right option depends on how much you still want water, the pool's condition, the yard layout, and local permit requirements.
Yes, a former pool footprint can become patio space, but pool to patio is not just a surface change. The project needs an approved strategy for the existing shell or pool removal and backfill, plus appropriate subgrade preparation, drainage, finished elevations, and the new hardscaping design. Do not assume an empty shell is automatically suitable to support a patio or platform.
Sometimes, but it should be evaluated as a real pool construction project rather than a simple cosmetic conversion. Existing shell geometry, reinforcing, plumbing, equipment, access, and local approvals can determine whether modifying the existing pool makes sense or whether substantial reconstruction would be required.
Permit and review requirements vary by city and project. Glendale's current guidance states that pool backfill projects require Design Review, while the City of Los Angeles publishes a dedicated swimming-pool backfill bulletin and related approval procedures. Confirm the requirements with the authority having jurisdiction before demolition or backfill begins.
No universal claim is responsible. Buyer preferences, neighborhood expectations, lot size, the condition of the existing pool, and the quality of the replacement yard all influence how a property may be perceived. If resale is central to the decision, get property-specific input from a local real-estate professional rather than relying on a generic value claim.
Start with the missing function in the yard. Common directions include a larger entertaining patio, a mixed patio-and-planting plan, garden space, lawn, a shaded lounge, or a flexible open area. The best replacement is not necessarily the feature that fills the most square footage; it is the layout your household will actually use and that works with drainage, circulation, and the rest of the property.
The former pool area has to be integrated into the site's finished grading and drainage plan. New patio or planting elevations should move water appropriately without creating a low basin against the house, walls, or neighboring property. Drainage should be resolved before the finished surface or planting plan is finalized.
We’d love to hear your ideas. Let’s explore what’s possible—no pressure, just a friendly conversation.
Give us a call:
+1 (818) 303-1570
Yes – We have a complete team of highly trained maintenance professionals to provide weekly, daily or even monthly services for your property. While a growing number of people have become dissatisfied with the poor quality of the typical ‘mow, blow, and go’ service, we take the time to maintain your property to perfection while providing a reliable service you can trust.